Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

2011.01.11 Advisory Group Meeting

Table of Contents



  • Introduce the Tools and Services Registry (TSR) initiative
  • Introduce project team and advisory group memebers
  • Clarify expectations of the Advisory Group
  • Assign tasks for the upcoming week

Issues / Concerns

  • That the TSR delivery of a digital tool and service registry meet other dependent project timelines
  • That the TSR does not become another data silo
  • That the TSR does not duplicate or "double" data content and/or entry
  • That the TSR does not overburden service providers and their staff
  • That service providers do not lose data quality in regards to their service descriptions and documentation
  • That the TSR define an appropriate method(s) of integrating/syncing current sources of record; this will require identifying these sources


  • Mock up the Windows VM service as a B2B model of how to represent a service on the TSR
  • To invite another service provider to join our team. The group proposed a B2C service
    • UC Backup
    • Telephony
  • The advisory group will identify the data model(s) to represent these service in the TSR
  • The fully-editable, community-source approach to TSR content is open for discussion. The sponsor prefers this model, but is open to counter argument by the advisory group.
  • The advisory group will identify "records of source" and how to integrate/sync these data sources with the TSR

Mock Up Access


To prepare for our next meeting, please complete the following by noon on Friday

Site Navigation
The root page UCB Tools and Services Registry could not be found in space IST Research and Content Technologies.